You are your brother's keeper

1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
abstract-woman
abstract-woman

I feel like at this point in time I'd feel more comfortable if everybody assumed all of my posts are by default no reblogs allowed. If i want people to reblog my posts I will explicitly tag it as such.

Edit: just to be clear I'm talking about my own posts my reblogged posts are obvsly free to reblog love u guys 💞

abstract-woman

Okay I’m gonna make an exception: if you’re a mutual and you’ve talked to me in the past, odds are p good that I’m ok with you or your followers reblogging my posts regardless if i specify ok to rb or not.

non-mutuals who habitually ignore this rule are now going to get shot

Pinned Post
sapper-in-the-wire
romcommunist

image

everyone sharing this as some inspirational feel-good story has worms for brains

jezabillion

So, essentially, like 80% of the value created by the workers is denied to the workers usually, so that the owner can line their own pocket? And the owner gets to do this simply because they "own" the business?

red--thedragon

You guys know that some of that money has to go to upkeep and overhead as well, right? Yes, I agree, there's issues with how workers are paid and owners walk away with far more money than they're worth, but even if it were a worker's coop or something they would still not be walking away with that much. Taxes, rent, materials and more do eat out of that if it isn't literally all being turned over to the workers, and the workers can't do anything if there's no building and no supplies.

aizawastapeworm

I agree that there's taxes and rent and upkeep to think about, but that's taken out of revenue.

Revenue is the word for the money the business takes in, without cost of goods sold taken out. Cost of goods sold includes variable costs (ex: the cost for the ingredients of pizza, sales tax, and usually, employee wages by the hour) and fixed costs (ex: rent, utilities, overhead).

Notice that the above article says profit. Profit is the money a business has when the cost of goods sold has been subtracted from the revenue. There's no tax money or rent money to be taken out of it, because it's already been taken out.

So this actually is a scenario where the owner is taking this money home. More money, in fact, since the $78 per hour had to be divided up amongst the employees that are working. Let's assume there are are only three employees. This means that the owner is taking home three times what the employees made on that day, everyday. And there may be more then three employees, meaning the owner could be making more money then my estimate.

Some simple math to break it further down for you. 78×3= 234. 234×8 hours = $1,872 for an 8 hour work day. While yes, there will still be some taxes to take out, that is nearly $1,900 per day for the owner. And the owner is probably paying $15 an hour at most to the employees.

I'm not explaining this to be condescending, im explaining this because it's an honest mistake to confuse profit for revenue, and because the above situation really pisses me off

abstract-woman

image
Source: romcommunist
afloweroutofstone

Anonymous asked:

Why do you say Cuba is not a democracy? They have a direct democracy. What is the benefit of allowing a liberal democracy where you can have people like trump in charge of your country every four years?

afloweroutofstone answered:

Why do you say Cuba is not a democracy?

TBH I don’t remember saying this any time recently. But I have probably said that in the past at some point, and it’s worth explaining why that’s the case in a way that isn’t anti-communist hysteria.

TL;DR - Cuban elections are undemocratic, US elections are too in ways both similar and different, peaceful democratization in both would be good, and that requires lifting our embargo and ending our interventionism

Keep reading

abstract-woman

a more succinct answer is that Cuba is not a democracy because it’s not supposed to be a democracy. A dictatorship of the proletariat is a literal dictatorship, headed by the Communist Party, which utilizes various democratic procedures to ascertain support among elements of the proletariat and to weed out unpopular figures and policies. Cuba is a democracy in a procedural manner, in that it strategically utilizes elections as a governing method, but it is fundamentally a dictatorship, in that all power ultimately still rests in the Communist Party and the Marxist ideology that it holds. You can argue whether this is a good or bad system, but it’s not a system that’s any more “authoritarian” than multiparty liberal democracy imo, and the presupposed benefits of Cuba adapting liberal democratic forms of government are very dubious, especially given the natural geopolitical influence of America regardless if it pursues a hostile interventionist policy or not.

Lenin has to be read as an incomplete break from the German Social-Democrat tradition in a similar vein to Rosa Luxemburg, except he was arguably a messier break, and whereas followers of Luxemburg generally tend to know which of what she says is just her repeating common socdem refrains at the time, too many leninists seems to have a personal agenda to amplify Lenin’s sloppiest actions and dictates to justify founding the 70th socialist party in the US to run as third party in elections because it will totally work this time this is exactly like tsarist russia in the 1910s pinkie promise